MOUNTAIN SILENCE
Issue 9: Spring
Dharma Talk

The Five Faculties:
cultivating the capacity for awareness

A Dharma Talk given by Abbot Ryushin Paul Haller on Wednesday, 10th February 2010 at Beginner's Mind Temple, San Francisco.
Transcribed by Frances Collins and Chris Brown.


Today I was talking to someone who had just turned 40 and who had discovered a few months ago that an old cancer, which was thought to be in remission, had metastasised to several places in the body, and it was necessary to go through a process of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. This person is also a practitioner and so we were talking about what it is like to practice with that. I was struck by a sort of nobility in the human capacity in being able to respond to something like that with the wisdom and compassion that somehow brings out the best in us… that nobility. It also made me think of this poem:

The way it is
By William Stafford.
There’s a thread you follow. It goes among
Things that change. But it doesn’t change.
People wonder about what you are pursuing.
You have to explain about the thread.
But it is hard for others to see.
While you hold it you can’t get lost.
Tragedies happen: people get hurt
Or die; and you suffer and get old.
Nothing you do can stop time’s unfolding.
You don’t ever let go of the thread.

There is something about the vow or intention to keep turning toward the nobility of the human spirit, to let it be the guiding light, the reference point. In studying the Dharma, part of what we are doing is intentionally shifting from the more usual frame of references that can come up as we meet our life. The fears and desires that come up and the ways they seem to shape our existence: “When am I going to get what I want and avoid what I don't want?”

The Dharma presents a different perspective. It also presents a way of being the person that we are that resonates deeply and fully with this innate nobility. As we tap into it and express it something within us is actually relieved. It's a bit like when we fall into, as the French call it, ‘petit’ or small mind - smaller ways of relating with the challenges of being alive. It casts its own description of what life is and what should be the intention with which we live it. When we do that, when we thwart our own nobility, there is a way in which we feel lesser; whether we begin to doubt our own capacity, whether our sense of what’s possible in our ability to live our human life shrinks, or we begin to feel dissatisfied with the way life appears to be. Living up to and expressing this nobility is a challenge.

We are studying a process within this practice of witnessing how this nobility is brought into being and how this nobility is nurtured, strengthened and allowed to be a strong influence in our lives. The starting place is intention. Almost despite ourselves our nobility stirs up an intention to practice. Maybe you could say that the path of practice is to continually clarify the intention and learn to live it, learn to become it. Within the process of our practice perhaps we can support each other and bear witness to each other’s question: What is your intention? And then to ask: What is it to live your intention? How does it influence how you relate to the different parts of your life? How does it influence how you relate to the different parts of yourself?

I'd like to talk about some formulations that come out of early Buddhist tradition that offer a reframing of the human experience. It's a little like way-seeking mind in which you are seeking a way, and practicing a way. It assumes that your life has brought you to being a practitioner. That’s the nature of it - that your life has contributed to such an event. If you think about it, it's a little bit of an unusual way to think about our life. The teachings of the Dharma offer us a reframing. In the midst of all the utilitarian necessities of our life… e.g. How will I make enough money to do this or that, or the other functional things that get involved? We can ask ourselves: What is it to create the capacity to be aware? How do you do that? What’s involved in it? What is it to engage in the process of becoming aware and let that being nurtured in our being? In the early teachings, cultivating this capacity was called ‘cultivating the five faculties’. Engaging them and nurturing and becoming the factors of awakening is what was called the seven factors of awakening.

The five faculties are trust, energy, mindfulness, concentration and wisdom. When we create an intention it is an interesting proposition, because in some ways it arises out of our nobility. But it is also influenced by some sense of discontent, some sense of wanting to respond to our own suffering, get rid of it, fix it… something! When I was talking to this person today one of the things that we were talking about was not wanting to die, and wanting to be cured. When you go through these treatments, you want them to be successful, you want to be cured. But if you cling to that the world tightens, the world becomes rigid and stiff. It loses the capacity to hold the simple truth that we don't know. We don't know how things are going to turn out. But there is almost a cellular wish to live, and that can give rise to this kind of motivation or intention. Then there’s the intention of practice, this wide acceptance, this acknowledgement that everything changes. These forces within us are both there. You might say that one is more like what we are trying to cultivate and the other one is more of what rises inherently in our existence. Often our intention is a mix of the two… and not to eradicate the intention that arises out of some sense of self-preservation, because being alive is precious. It is a blessed opportunity; it is there to be appreciated and savoured. There is something in that appreciation and gratitude for being alive that lets something in us soften, and find its ease, that interestingly inclines us toward wider acceptance. So our intention is a mix. Intention gives rise to our engagement in the practice. Engagement that arises from our intention is stimulated by our discipline and perseverance. It is stimulated by our commitment, but it requests us not to become rigid in our commitment and our persistence, not to let it become a sort of white-knuckled determination. That gets too closely linked to thinking, “I have to live at all costs,” which means it has to happen in accordance with my fears, my wishes.

The first faculty of trust (or confidence), which includes commitment, and the second factor of energy (or perseverance) - they balance each other. It’s like trust in the way life is. When we become too anxious and determined in our practice, we are losing our trust and appreciation in how life is. It is almost as if we are in mistrusting or missing the beauty of each moment in our determined effort to make it how we wish it should be. One of the things in working with severe illness is learning to trust the practice and let the outcome happen. Of course when you have a severe or life-threatening illness, it is ferocious in how it keeps returning you to that… just trust the practice and let the outcome be what ever it is. Really, we all share that condition. We are all impermanent. We are not omniscient - we do not know how our life is going to unfold. The request is there for all of us - the request of trust and how it can influence and balance our commitment, our determination and our energy.

So our intention inspires, guides, and stimulates our efforts. Also, we can ask ourselves, “How can I relate to this in a way that expresses my intention?” In whatever realm old life it is. “How should I relate to this person in a way that expresses my intention?” In the engagement, something about our practice, something about our innate ability as a human being, something about revealing the nature of what it is, is activated. Something is activated and in the realm of practice that becomes our teacher. That becomes a teaching of the way things are, of what is, and it guides us in our effort. Sometimes the guidance is that our practice is too loose and sometimes our practice is too tight. We need to emphasise discipline or we need to emphasise loosening up a little bit - don't be so rigid or determined.

The next faculty is mindfulness. Sometimes the way the word ‘sati’ or mindfulness appears in the sutras seems almost contradictory. We can talk about being aware -you can reflect at the end of your day and say, “What were the notable events of today?” Then you can reflect on what exactly was experienced. “What were the responses that arose in me to those experiences? Is there any pattern to them? Do they reveal anything about the conditioned ways in which I respond to experiences, what I perceive as different personality types or different kinds of events?” That's one form of awareness. That form of sati or awareness helps us to cultivate the capacity to bring that same attention into real time, to be present for experiences and events as they are happening rather than later reflecting or revisiting them. We start to be present for events as they are happening, present for the feelings, the immediate sense impressions, the concepts that arise in our mind. As we start to do that, quite literally, the capacity to be present sets the stage for the capacity to respond intentionally. If we’re only aware of it days later, there’s no way to be intentional within it. To be intentional within our experience requires us to be present for it. The reflection helps to establish that capacity. In the process of reflection, just note: “What was that experience?” Especially if something stays in the heart and mind as unfinished business, we keep replaying it; something about it isn’t settled.

Often it’s helpful to reflect upon it matter-of-factly: this was the experience, this was the response to the experience. Sometimes it’s mysterious - we just have some imagery. Something powerful and upsetting happened, but I can’t remember exactly what that person said, I just remember how I felt when they said it. Taking the backward step: taking the experience as it is, in its unfinished way, and then stepping back. In the stepping back, cultivating the ability to just note what happened. This sets a foundation for doing that in real time: to just note what’s happening, and how that’s responded to. Then, meeting that with the intentionality that the other faculties are cultivating - the intentionality of engaging it right now with awareness and insightfulness, with wisdom. The different faculties set the stage for each other, balancing and promoting each other.

As sati becomes more evident in the moment, the different attributes of it become more readily experienced. Sati has no agenda, just saying “What’s happening right now?” not “What should happen now?” It’s an openness, very much the flavour of shikantaza – just sitting in the Zen school. Our zazen has at its centre point to just sit with open awareness. As you bring the intentionality that turns onto commitment, to that, all this unfolds some marvellous, organic, natural, way in which this just processes. Then, awareness, and the capacity to be in awareness, unfolds and becomes what happens.

As sati becomes more evident, the next faculty arises - samadhi, continuous contact. We start to see there are different forms of continuous contact; for example, the form of directing attention. Sometimes it’s useful to ask “What’s going on in my body?” This is very helpful for stabilising agitated emotions, or making contact when the mind is racing, either from emotional stimulation or because many different ideas are coming up. We can ask, “Is that how it is, or am I just making that up?” While being barraged by a wealth of ideas and concepts, we can ask, “What’s happening in my body? Are my shoulders tight? Is my belly soft? Is my jaw clenched?” letting this become more immediate, in a simple sensed way. Or in our meditation, returning to the sensation of breathing, as a way to cut through rumination, distracting thought, as a way to become grounded in the body, in the moment. The other form of samadhi is open contact – just availably to experience whatever arises in that moment. But, usually, we experience some blend of the two types. If there’s just open awareness the mind tends to drift; the direction of attention helps to establish the ability to open without an agenda in objectless concentration.

The final factor of the five is prajna, or wisdom. You could say that our insights happen in layers. First of all, we become aware of what our mind says is happening in the moment. Perhaps I’m being annoyed by an annoying person. Maybe we start by just noticing there’s an annoying person in our presence. Then we start to notice, we’re having the experience of annoyance. Then we start to notice we’re perceiving this person in a certain way, and that perception is contributing to the experience of annoyance. Then we start to notice, we have a pattern of perceiving certain kinds of people this way. Then we start to notice, there’s something about conditioned existence, the human condition, that promotes patterns of response. Then we notice that these patterns of response are not permanent, they come and go. As they do that, they create a sense of lack of harmony, or suffering, dukkha.

So in one way, we could say it’s a linear progression. In another way, we could say we’re far too complex to have a neat orderly way to experience, a neat orderly process of insight. Sometimes we have a profound insight about the nature of existence, and then the next moment we pop back into believing our own constructed experience in that moment. The process of insight as a foundation for awareness is to be like this: when the insights arise, to let it register, and maybe in doing so to let it have the same or more authority than the other statements we make about reality. “This is a really annoying person.” Our mind believes, that’s how the world is, that’s how this person is. So in studying the Dharma, in entertaining its propositions, it offers a reframing that can set the stage for insights; such as, this is a co-dependent arising, the product of what’s experienced and how it’s responded to. We can see it in real time, and discover how it is, letting it be witnessed – something about the nature of what is.

Reading about it is not a substitute for experiencing it. Reading about it is reading about it. You can read about Australia - that’s not a substitute for going to Australia. But it can reframe, set the stage, and point our intention in a certain way. So there’s something about letting our insights have authority. As we do that our insights will illuminate and make more evident the other statements we make about the nature of what is, and illuminate the thoughts that get interwoven into our patterns of response. As they do that, sometimes that has a painful quality to it. These sets of responses are, in a way, our best effort to make our life manageable and free of suffering. As we start to expose them, there’s something disconcerting about that. We’re challenging our own coping mechanisms. This is where the other faculties balance out our sense of distress or discomfort that arises as our insights challenge our sense of what is and who we are. Sustaining our trust the practice, sustaining our direct involvement in direct experiencing of our practice, sustaining the openness of mind that’s just letting everything coming in, letting the thoughts and feelings arise and fall away. Sometimes our “a-ha!” moments are often very encouraging and greatly inspiring: “Yes, I’m really getting it now!” Or maybe there’s an insight that helps you see how you can stuck that causes suffering, and it really sets you free. But it is helpful to note and remember that the process of insight can have a quality of being unsettling. Insight really challenges our coping mechanisms, the stories we hold on to, and that is often uncomfortable. Sometimes that discomfort expresses itself in that we can feel anything from a sense of failure, that things are not working out well, to a wish to pull back from practice… and so we try to practice with that. Notice that this is just what arises as you start to expose your own psychological strategies. Can I just keep breathing, and let something soften and stay open? It’s still a matter of staying with the fundamentals of practice, and reminding yourself not to get caught in discouragement or aversion. It’s helpful to remember this funny way in which are own insights can create that within us.

So that’s the five faculties – setting the stage. Many of those faculties are included in the factors of awakening. It’s a bit like the relationship between discipline and devotion. Discipline is like a directed, determined, effort. Devotion comes when through that effort, that engagement has become part of us. We’ve given over to it. As you continue to practice, mindfulness just becomes… what you do. So if you’re ill, you might not think to yourself, “Well, best practice with this”, but it’s more like, what else can you do, except be awake for yourself? Even when it’s not something you wanted or something that’s easy to be awake for. So as we give ourselves over, the faculties become potent forces in our life; they become the factors of awakening. We start to taste directly that something about this way of involving a human life has a potency. It’s not something that we can control, or even fully define or predict; it’s more something we can allow fuller and fuller involvement in. As William Stafford says,

There’s a thread you follow. It goes among
Things that change. But it doesn’t change.

In Buddhism we might not say it doesn’t change, but that it flows through all the change.

People wonder about what you are pursuing.

Maybe you wonder what you’re pursuing, or not pursuing!

You have to explain about the thread.
But it is hard for others to see.
While you hold it you can’t get lost.
Tragedies happen: people get hurt
Or die; and you suffer and get old.
Nothing you do can stop time’s unfolding.
You don’t ever let go of the thread.


Thank you very much.



Back to front page